Stage 2 · Free
Most funded futures traders know the sizing formula in principle — DTF divided by 10 for per-trade target ceilings, DLL divided by 4 for per-trade loss ceilings. The gap is not in the formula, it is in the inputs. The trailing drawdown floor advanced since yesterday, which means the DTF value changed. The daily loss limit reset at settlement. The consistency window may have entered a hold period overnight. The profit stop ceiling is calculated from cumulative net profit, which is different from yesterday's. Four checks, each reading a live value, catch the drift before the first contract is placed.
Part 1 of 4 — The two-input pre-session calculation
DTF÷10 and DLL÷4 are the formula outputs, not the inputs. The inputs are the current trailing drawdown floor position (which determines the DTF value) and the current DLL remaining (which resets at settlement each day). Carrying yesterday's numbers forward introduces a systematic error that grows with every session the floor advances.
The evaluation dashboard shows two values that feed the sizing formula: the current trailing drawdown floor position and the daily loss limit remaining for today's session. The trailing drawdown floor position determines the DTF distance — calculated as current balance minus floor position, the same floor-room metric covered in the trailing drawdown floor mechanics article. But the formula input needed here is the DTF itself, not the floor-room: DTF = evaluation account size minus starting floor position, and remains constant at the value set by the firm throughout the evaluation (a $50,000 account with a $2,000 DTF keeps a $2,000 DTF regardless of what the floor has advanced to). The DLL remaining is the session's hard ceiling — it resets to the firm's daily loss limit value at settlement each day.
The reason to read both from the live dashboard rather than the prior session's journal entry is that the floor position in the journal may be stale for EOD firms if any position was open at settlement the previous session. In an EOD trailing drawdown model, the floor advances at settlement based on the closing balance including unrealized P&L on open positions — meaning the floor position at the end of yesterday's session close and the floor position after settlement can be different. The journal entry records the post-session floor position, but an EOD firm's settlement floor advance may have occurred after the journal was written. The dashboard confirms the current floor position as the firm records it. The pre-session sizing calculation starts with the dashboard, not the journal. The five-step pre-session sequence in how to read a funded futures evaluation dashboard covers the full order of checks.
With the DTF and DLL values in hand from the dashboard, the two-formula calculation takes under ten seconds. DTF÷10 sets the per-trade target ceiling: the maximum profit target to set on any single trade in today's session. For a $50,000 account with a $2,000 DTF, DTF÷10 equals $200. DLL÷4 sets the per-trade loss ceiling: the maximum loss to accept on any single trade before exiting regardless of the trade's direction. For a $50,000 account with a $1,000 DLL, DLL÷4 equals $250. The $200 target ceiling and $250 loss ceiling are today's per-trade boundaries. Full derivation of these formulas — why DTF÷10 and DLL÷4 specifically — is in funded futures position sizing.
Both outputs should be written down or held in working memory before the session opens. The per-trade target ceiling is not the same as the daily profit stop ceiling (which is calculated in Part 4 of this checklist). The per-trade target ceiling governs individual trade exits; the daily profit stop ceiling governs when the session ends. A session that runs four trades each exiting at the per-trade target ceiling of $200 earns $800 net — but if the daily profit stop ceiling is $280, the session should have ended after the first $280 of net profit, not after four trades at the per-trade ceiling. The two ceilings serve different functions and are calculated from different inputs. The sizing formula outputs (DTF÷10 and DLL÷4) are per-trade limits; the profit stop is a session-total limit.
In standard evaluation conditions, DLL÷4 is typically larger than DTF÷10 — the daily loss limit per-trade ceiling allows more loss per trade than the DTF-based target ceiling allows in profit. But the relationship can invert when the DLL is reduced by partial losses from prior sessions. A $1,000 DLL that has lost $400 across earlier trades today leaves $600 remaining. DLL÷4 of the remaining $600 is $150 — below the $200 DTF÷10 target ceiling. In this case, the $150 loss ceiling becomes the binding constraint, not the $200 target ceiling. The per-trade ceiling is the tighter of the two: whichever of DTF÷10 and DLL÷4 (calculated from today's remaining DLL) is smaller.
The binding constraint shift is most likely to occur mid-session when re-entering after one or more loss-ceiling exits have reduced the remaining DLL. Before re-entering, recalculate DLL÷4 using the current remaining DLL, not the full DLL the session started with. A session that started with a $1,000 DLL and has used $400 in prior stop-outs has $600 remaining — and subsequent trades should use DLL÷4 of $600, which is $150, as the loss ceiling. This inversion is not a reason to avoid trading after early losses; it is a reason to run a quick recalculation before each re-entry rather than assuming the morning's DLL÷4 value still applies. The account sizing comparison across evaluation tiers in funded futures account sizing by tier covers how this binding-constraint crossover behaves at each tier's DLL and DTF values.
Part 2 of 4 — The instrument-and-stop-distance verification
The instrument-and-stop-distance check translates the abstract DLL÷4 ceiling into a concrete position size for today's instrument and today's planned stop distance. It confirms that the planned trade fits within the per-trade loss ceiling before the market opens, not after the first stop-out.
The instrument-and-stop-distance formula is: number of contracts × stop distance in ticks × dollar value per tick = maximum loss on the trade. This dollar amount must be at or below DLL÷4. For a $1,000 DLL, DLL÷4 equals $250. One MNQ contract has a tick value of $2.00. A 20-tick stop distance produces a maximum loss of 1 contract × 20 ticks × $2.00, which equals $40. The $40 loss is well below the $250 ceiling, confirming the sizing fits. One ES contract has a tick value of $12.50. A 6-tick stop produces a maximum loss of 1 contract × 6 ticks × $12.50, which equals $75. Still below the $250 ceiling. Two ES contracts with a 12-tick stop produce 2 × 12 × $12.50, which equals $300 — above the $250 ceiling. Two contracts does not fit; one contract at the same stop distance is $150, which fits.
The tick values for common evaluation instruments: MNQ (Micro E-mini Nasdaq) $2.00 per tick, ES (E-mini S&P 500) $12.50 per tick, NQ (E-mini Nasdaq) $5.00 per tick, CL (Crude Oil) $10.00 per tick, GC (Gold) $10.00 per tick. Instrument selection and the full tick-value comparison is in best futures instruments for funded accounts. The stop distance used in the pre-session check should be the actual planned stop for today's setup — not an average or a round number. A setup with a 15-tick stop requires the 15-tick check, not a 10-tick check that understates the loss.
A $50,000 evaluation with a $1,000 DLL and $2,000 DTF. Pre-session calculation: DTF÷10 = $200 per-trade target ceiling, DLL÷4 = $250 per-trade loss ceiling. Instrument: MNQ. Planned stop: 20 ticks. Check: 1 × 20 × $2.00 = $40. Result: fits. The trader can place one MNQ contract with a 20-tick stop and remain within the loss ceiling. Extending to two MNQ contracts: 2 × 20 × $2.00 = $80. Still fits. Three MNQ contracts: 3 × 20 × $2.00 = $120. Fits. Six MNQ contracts: 6 × 20 × $2.00 = $240. Under the $250 ceiling — fits. Seven MNQ: 7 × 20 × $2.00 = $280. Exceeds the $250 ceiling. Maximum is six MNQ contracts at a 20-tick stop for this DLL÷4 ceiling.
Now the same account with NQ instead of MNQ. NQ tick value: $5.00. One NQ contract with a 20-tick stop: 1 × 20 × $5.00 = $100. Fits. Two NQ contracts: 2 × 20 × $5.00 = $200. Fits. Three NQ: $300. Exceeds the $250 ceiling. Maximum is two NQ contracts at this stop. If the planned setup requires a wider stop — say 30 ticks on NQ — one contract produces 1 × 30 × $5.00 = $150. Fits. Two contracts: $300. Exceeds. The answer is one NQ contract with a 30-tick stop. The stop distance and the instrument together determine the contract ceiling; neither can be evaluated in isolation. The full instrument-and-size comparison across evaluation tiers is in funded futures account sizing by tier.
When the pre-session instrument-and-stop check fails — the planned contracts and stop distance produce a dollar loss above DLL÷4 — there are two adjustments available: reduce the number of contracts to bring the math within the ceiling, or narrow the stop distance if the setup supports a tighter stop without changing the trade's invalidation point. Neither adjustment is wrong by default; the choice depends on whether the setup's logic can support a tighter stop or whether the stop distance is already at the minimum that preserves the trade's thesis.
What is not an adjustment is trading the planned size and managing the stop manually mid-session. The DLL÷4 ceiling is a pre-session rule that prevents a single trade from using a disproportionate share of the day's loss budget. A manual mid-session stop at a different level than planned changes the position's risk profile after the trade is open — and under live conditions, manual exit decisions under loss pressure do not consistently outperform pre-set stops. The adjustment to sizing happens before the first trade is placed, when the calculation is objective and the market has no influence on the decision. If neither a contract reduction nor a stop-distance narrowing produces a math-fit while preserving the trade's thesis, the honest conclusion is that the planned instrument does not fit the account's current DLL at the planned stop width — and a different instrument, a different session, or a different setup should be chosen. The behavioral consequences of not running this check are covered in funded futures common mistakes.
Part 3 of 4 — The consistency window check
The consistency check before a session is a one-question lookup: is there a consistency hold active right now? If yes, the session can still proceed, but the daily profit stop ceiling takes on added weight — a session that pushes the best-day percentage higher during a hold extends the hold's duration.
A consistency hold is triggered when the best-day percentage in the current payout period exceeds the firm's consistency threshold. The threshold varies by firm (commonly 25%, 30%, or 40%) but the hold mechanism is similar: once the best-day percentage crosses the threshold, the current payout period cannot be submitted for payout until the denominator (total net profit across all sessions in the period) grows enough to bring the percentage back under the threshold. The account is not closed, trading is not suspended, and the DLL and DTF rules are unchanged. The only consequence is that the payout at the end of this period is delayed until the hold clears.
The hold's clearance condition is denominator-driven: additional sessions that add to the total net profit without setting a new best day will reduce the best-day percentage over time. Example: best day was $500 in a period where total net profit is $1,500 — best-day percentage is 33.3%, above the 30% threshold, triggering a hold. Three more sessions at $100 each bring total net profit to $1,800 and the best-day percentage to $500÷$1,800 = 27.8%, clearing the hold. The hold cleared without any change to the best-day amount — only the denominator changed. The mechanics of how the consistency rule interacts with payout periods in the funded phase is in funded account consistency rule. The walkthrough of the best-day percentage calculation is in consistency rule walkthrough.
In most funded account structures, sessions during a hold period contribute to the payout period's total net profit denominator. A session that earns $100 during a hold adds $100 to the denominator, reducing the best-day percentage for that period. This means the hold is self-clearing through continued trading — the hold is not a signal to stop trading; it is a signal to trade within the daily profit stop ceiling so that no new session becomes the period's best day and resets the percentage calculation from a higher starting point.
The risk during a hold period is a session that exceeds the current best-day amount and becomes the new best day. If the current best day is $500 and a session during the hold earns $600, the $600 becomes the new best day. The denominator grows by $600, but the numerator also grows to $600 — changing the best-day percentage from $500÷(prior total) to $600÷(prior total + $600). Whether this helps or hurts depends on the prior total, but in most cases a new best day during a hold period extends the hold rather than shortening it. The daily profit stop ceiling from Part 4 of this checklist is the practical protection: stopping the session before net profit for the day exceeds the current best-day amount prevents a new best-day event. The firm-specific variation in whether sessions during a hold count and how the percentage resets is covered in funded futures firm rule differences.
If the pre-session check finds an active consistency hold, the useful follow-on question is: how many more sessions at what earnings level would clear the hold? The arithmetic is straightforward: (best-day amount ÷ consistency threshold) minus current total net profit equals the additional earnings needed to clear the hold at the threshold. Example: best day $500, threshold 30%, current total $1,500 — hold clears when total reaches $500÷0.30 = $1,666.67, which requires $166.67 more in net profit across any combination of sessions. At one $100 session and one $80 session, the hold would clear. At two $85 sessions, it would clear. This projection gives a concrete target for how many normal-sized sessions remain before the hold clears, without requiring a single session to do exceptional work.
The planning implication is session-sizing, not session-skipping. A hold is not a reason to take a larger than normal position to clear it faster — that approach risks a new best-day event and a longer hold. Normal-sized sessions at the standard profit stop ceiling are both the mechanism for clearing the hold and the protection against extending it. Knowing the projected clearance gives a factual frame for when the payout window opens, which is more useful than treating the hold as an indefinite obstacle. The post-session update to the journal's consistency window field (covering running denominator and best-day percentage after each session) keeps this projection current without requiring a fresh calculation from scratch each time. The evaluation journal tracking framework is in funded futures evaluation journal.
Part 4 of 4 — The daily profit stop pre-session calculation
The daily profit stop is the session-level ceiling that limits how much any single session can contribute to the trailing drawdown floor's advancement. It is voluntary — the DLL does not enforce it — but it is the practical mechanism that keeps evaluation progression consistent and prevents one outsized session from narrowing the floor-room for all remaining sessions.
The daily profit stop formula is: total evaluation net profit (cumulative across all sessions to date) times 0.28 equals today's voluntary session ceiling. For an evaluation where the running net profit is $1,200, today's ceiling is $1,200 × 0.28 = $336. The session ends — voluntarily, by closing all positions and stepping away — when the day's net profit reaches $336, regardless of how the market is behaving. The ceiling is calculated fresh before each session from the cumulative net profit figure, not from a fixed session target. As the evaluation progresses and cumulative net profit grows, the ceiling grows proportionally — reflecting the reality that a larger cumulative gain can support a proportionally larger single-session contribution without producing a consistency violation.
The 0.28 coefficient is not arbitrary: it is derived from the 30% consistency rule threshold with a small buffer. A session ceiling at 28% of total profit keeps the best-day percentage at 28% of the running total even if that session becomes the new best day. Staying at 28% leaves a 2-percentage-point buffer below the common 30% threshold. The full derivation and the interaction between the profit stop formula and the consistency rule denominator is in funded futures daily profit stop. The pre-session timing for this calculation is important: the cumulative net profit figure comes from the dashboard (or from the journal's running total), not from memory. A session that was larger or smaller than expected yesterday changes today's ceiling.
The standard profit stop formula (total net profit × 0.28) assumes the account is in normal operations, meaning floor-room is at least as large as one full daily loss limit. When floor-room falls below one DLL, the account is in drawdown recovery territory: the daily loss limit cannot fully trigger without bringing the balance so close to the floor that recovery requires multiple consecutive profitable sessions. In this condition, using the standard profit stop ceiling — which allows a session to earn up to 28% of cumulative net profit — would let one large session advance the floor further when the floor is already at a level where any further advancement is problematic.
The drawdown recovery ceiling substitutes DLL÷6 for the standard formula during the recovery period. For a $1,000 DLL, DLL÷6 equals approximately $167. A session ceiling of $167 limits floor advancement to $167 of the DTF distance per session, preserving floor-room for subsequent sessions at a time when floor-room is the scarce resource. The tighter ceiling is not a punishment — it is a practical recognition that the account's priority has shifted from profit accumulation to floor-room restoration. Once floor-room exceeds one full DLL again (confirmed from the dashboard before the next session), the standard 0.28 formula resumes. The full drawdown recovery framework — including the three-session-consecutive criterion for returning to normal operations — is in how to recover from a drawdown on a funded futures account. Floor-room is calculated as current balance minus trailing drawdown floor, both available from the evaluation dashboard.
The four pre-session steps are not independent checks run in any order — they form a sequence where each output informs the next step's calculation. Step 1 (dashboard pull) provides the DTF and DLL values that feed Step 2's formula. Step 2 (instrument-stop check) confirms what contract size fits the DLL÷4 ceiling from Step 1. Step 3 (consistency hold check) determines whether the daily profit stop ceiling from Step 4 also needs to respect the current best-day amount to avoid extending a hold. Step 4 (profit stop calculation) uses the cumulative net profit from the dashboard and the floor-room check to set the ceiling for the entire session. Running the steps out of order introduces dependencies: Step 4's floor-room check requires knowing the DTF from Step 1; Step 3's hold-management implication requires knowing the profit stop ceiling from Step 4 to compare against the current best-day amount.
The practical routine is under two minutes when the dashboard is open and the four outputs are written in a consistent format: (1) DTF = [value], DLL remaining = [value]; (2) DTF÷10 = [target ceiling], DLL÷4 = [loss ceiling], contract fit: [instrument] × [contracts] × [stop ticks] = [loss] — fits or fails; (3) consistency hold: yes / no; if yes, denominator gap = [amount needed]; (4) profit stop ceiling: [cumulative net profit] × 0.28 = [ceiling] — or DLL÷6 = [ceiling] if in recovery. These four lines, written before the market opens, are the operational translation of the evaluation's risk rules into today's specific numbers. The prior general articles — position sizing, daily profit stop, consistency rule, floor mechanics — provide the framework; this checklist is the session-level execution of that framework.
The four steps are: (1) Pull the trailing drawdown floor position and DLL remaining from the dashboard, then calculate DTF÷10 as the per-trade target ceiling and DLL÷4 as the per-trade loss ceiling. (2) Verify that one contract at the planned instrument and stop distance produces a dollar loss at or below DLL÷4. (3) Check whether the account is currently in a consistency hold — holds allow trading but block payout until the denominator catches up. (4) Calculate total net profit times 0.28 to set the day's voluntary profit stop ceiling, or use DLL÷6 if floor-room is below one full DLL. All four inputs come from the live dashboard before the first trade.
The trailing drawdown floor advances with every new balance high in evaluation, which changes the floor position that feeds the DTF input. The DLL also resets at settlement each day. In an EOD firm, the floor may have advanced overnight if a position was held through settlement with an unrealized gain — meaning the floor position recorded in yesterday's journal entry can differ from today's dashboard reading. Using yesterday's numbers introduces a systematic error that compounds with every session the floor advances. The dashboard reading before each session is the only source that reflects both the current floor position and the current DLL with no stale data.
The formula is: contracts × stop distance in ticks × tick value per contract = maximum loss. This must be at or below DLL÷4. Example: one MNQ contract at a 20-tick stop = 1 × 20 × $2.00 = $40. With a $1,000 DLL, DLL÷4 is $250. The $40 loss fits. If the planned size is two NQ contracts at a 15-tick stop: 2 × 15 × $5.00 = $150. Still fits at $250 ceiling. If it is three NQ at a 20-tick stop: 3 × 20 × $5.00 = $300. Exceeds $250 — does not fit. Reduce to two contracts or narrow the stop distance until the math fits before placing the first trade.
A consistency hold means the best-day percentage in the current payout period has exceeded the firm's threshold. The hold does not suspend trading — the DLL, DTF, and all account rules remain unchanged. It blocks the next payout until the denominator (total net profit in the period) grows enough to bring the best-day percentage back under the threshold. Sessions during a hold count toward the denominator in most firms, so normal-sized sessions are the mechanism that clears the hold. The risk during a hold is trading a session that earns more than the current best day, which sets a new best-day amount and may extend the hold further.
When floor-room is larger than one full daily loss limit, the standard formula applies: total net profit times 0.28 equals today's session ceiling. When floor-room falls below one full DLL, the account is in drawdown recovery territory and the ceiling becomes DLL÷6 instead of the standard formula. The tighter recovery ceiling limits the floor's further advancement at a time when floor-room is already the scarce resource. Once floor-room recovers above one full DLL — confirmed from the dashboard before the next session — the standard 0.28 formula resumes. Floor-room is current balance minus trailing drawdown floor, both available on the evaluation dashboard.
Founding 100
The Founding 100 closes when 100 members are in. After that, pricing moves to the standard rate. If you're reading the library and working through evaluations, the founding tier is the time to join.
See the Founding 100 offer