Stage 2–3 bridge · Free
After a funded futures evaluation shows a pass, the firm reviews the account and provisions a new funded account — a process that typically takes 1-3 business days. During that window, the evaluation account is read-only and the funded account credentials have not been issued yet. The time is not dead time. Calculating funded sizing from the funded account tier's parameters, re-reading the funded agreement's different rules, and planning the first payout eligibility window are the productive actions. Not starting another evaluation. Not sizing up in simulation expecting the results to transfer.
Part 1 of 4 — The activation window
Understanding what is happening during the activation window — and when it starts — prevents two common mistakes: checking the dashboard repeatedly for a change that hasn't happened yet, and misreading a normal provisioning timeline as a sign that something went wrong with the pass.
When a funded futures evaluation shows a pass on the dashboard, two processes start at the firm side: a review of the evaluation account's trading history (to verify the pass against the agreement's terms) and the provisioning of the new funded account (to generate a new account number, set the starting balance, apply the funded account's drawdown model, and issue access credentials). These processes run in the background on the firm's systems. The evaluation account is locked to read-only during this window. The full description of what happens after you pass a funded futures evaluation covers the firm's review process in detail — what the firm checks, what triggers an extended review, and what to expect when the funded account becomes active.
The activation window itself is not an exception or a sign of a problem. It is the firm's standard operating process for moving a trader from evaluation status to funded status. Most firms do not issue real-time progress updates during the provisioning window because the process runs on the firm's internal timeline — not in response to trader inquiries during the window.
The activation window's stated timeline typically runs from when the pass is confirmed and submitted to the firm's review queue — which may differ slightly from when the dashboard first displayed a pass status. For firms that use automatic dashboard updates triggered by reaching the profit target, the dashboard may show a pass before the firm's review process has formally started. For firms that manually review and confirm passes before updating the dashboard, the clock starts from the notification email rather than from the dashboard change.
The firm's FAQ or post-pass notification email usually states the activation timeline in terms of "business days from pass notification" or "business days from submission to review." If the stated timeline is ambiguous, the more conservative interpretation — clock starts from the pass notification email, not from the dashboard display — gives a more accurate expectation for when the funded account credentials will be issued.
An extended activation window — one that runs past the firm's stated timeline without communication — may indicate that the firm's review has surfaced a finding that requires additional verification or documentation. This is distinct from the normal provisioning window running slightly longer than estimated due to volume or operational scheduling. The signals that distinguish an active review finding from normal variation: the dashboard reverts from pass status to "under review" or a similar pending indicator; the firm sends a communication requesting documentation or clarification; or the window runs more than 2 business days past the stated timeline without any update.
If these signals appear, the guidance in the article on why funded futures evaluation passes get rejected covers the four rejection triggers and the appropriate response to each. An extended window without these specific signals is more likely normal provisioning variation than an active review finding. Part 3 of this article covers when and how to contact the firm if the window extends past the stated timeline.
Part 2 of 4 — What to do during the wait
The activation window is the last opportunity to read, calculate, and plan before the first funded session starts. Unlike the evaluation, the funded account does not tolerate a recalibration phase — breaching the DLL in the first week ends the account. Using the wait to establish the funded parameters correctly avoids that failure mode.
The funded account section of the agreement — or the separate funded account agreement, depending on the firm — governs the funded phase. It is a different document or section from the evaluation agreement. Three rule categories most commonly differ between the evaluation and the funded phase: the drawdown model (EOD vs intraday trailing drawdown, or a static max loss in some funded structures), the consistency rule (some firms apply a different threshold in the funded phase, some extend the consistency window to all-time rather than the payout period, and some drop the rule after the pass), and the payout terms (minimum qualifying days, minimum profit threshold, payout request process, and review timeline). See how funded futures firm rules actually differ for the full taxonomy of rule variation between firms and phases.
The practical read: open the funded account section of the agreement and confirm three numbers before the account activates — the funded account DLL (daily loss limit), the funded trailing drawdown distance (if it differs from the evaluation), and the payout request minimum. These three numbers feed directly into the sizing calculation and the first payout planning described below. Also note any differences in instrument permissions or trading-hour definitions between the evaluation and funded phases — the reference on prohibited instruments and trading hours describes what to verify in both the evaluation and funded agreement contexts.
Funded account sizing uses the same DTF/10 and DLL/4 formula as evaluation sizing, but applied to the funded account tier's parameters. The inputs are the funded DLL (daily loss limit for the funded account) and the funded DTF (daily trade fee ceiling for the funded account) from the funded agreement — not the evaluation's DLL and DTF, and not the evaluation's P&L history. See funded futures position sizing for the full DTF/10 and DLL/4 calculation, and funded futures account sizing by tier for the specific outputs at each account tier.
The key calculation: per-trade ceiling = DLL ÷ 4, where DLL is the funded account's DLL from the funded agreement. For a $50K funded account with a $1,000 DLL, the per-trade ceiling is $250. The evaluation's DLL may have been different — higher or lower — depending on the firm and tier. Calculate from the funded parameters, not from what the evaluation allowed. Also: the trailing drawdown model for the funded account may differ from the evaluation's model. The article on how trailing drawdown rules change after the pass covers how the floor-lock mechanism affects funded account sizing decisions differently from evaluation sizing decisions.
The first payout request requires meeting several conditions simultaneously: reaching the minimum profit threshold, completing the minimum number of qualifying days, passing the consistency check, and maintaining a buffer above the trailing drawdown floor. These parameters are in the funded agreement's payout section. Reading them during the activation window — before the account activates — allows the first funded session to start with a concrete target and timeline rather than an open-ended expectation about when the first payout is possible.
The planning calculation: take the funded account's minimum qualifying days requirement (often 10 or 15 days) and the consistency rule threshold (typically 25-30% of total profits in a single session). At the funded account's DLL/4 per-trade ceiling and a realistic session frequency, estimate how many calendar weeks the minimum qualifying days will take. This is the earliest payout eligibility date, assuming the consistency rule is not triggered in the meantime. The guidance in how funded futures payouts work covers the five gates that must all pass before a payout request is submitted — planning the timeline during the activation window means the first funded session starts with a clear target.
Part 3 of 4 — When to contact the firm
The timing and format of a contact during the activation window affects both the response quality and how the inquiry is recorded. A well-timed, specific written inquiry through the correct support channel gets the most useful response.
The firm's stated activation timeline — from the post-pass notification email or the firm's FAQ — is the trigger for contact if the window passes without an update. If the firm states "2-3 business days" and the third business day has passed without the funded account credentials being issued or any communication from the firm, that is the appropriate time to send an inquiry. Sending an inquiry during the normal provisioning window — before the stated timeline has passed — typically results in a generic response confirming that the account is being processed on the normal timeline, and does not accelerate the process.
Exception: if the dashboard changes state from pass to "under review" or a similar pending indicator, that specific change is worth inquiring about before the stated timeline passes, because it suggests the review has surfaced a finding. In that case, the inquiry should reference the dashboard state change specifically rather than asking a general status question.
Send one written inquiry — email to the firm's support address or a support ticket through the firm's portal — with three specific questions: (1) What is the current status of account activation for account [your account identifier]? (2) What is the expected completion date? (3) Is there any documentation or information required from me to complete the process?
The channel matters: email and support tickets create a written record of the inquiry and the response. Live chat responses are often general and do not carry the same documentation value as a written exchange. If the firm's primary support channel is live chat, ask the support agent to send a follow-up email confirming the answer so the response is documented. This is particularly important if the inquiry relates to an extended review or a potential finding — documented firm responses are useful reference if the account status requires further follow-up.
Send one inquiry. If the firm does not respond within 2 business days of that inquiry, a second follow-up referencing the original ticket number or email thread is appropriate. Do not send multiple inquiries before receiving a response to the first — the firm's support queue processes inquiries in order, and duplicate tickets can split the response trail or slow the handling of the original inquiry.
The firm's review process runs on its own schedule regardless of inquiry frequency. An account in a normal provisioning process is not accelerated by follow-up messages. An account that has surfaced a finding in review is also not accelerated — those reviews proceed on the timeline required by whatever the finding involves. Patience through the stated window and a single well-documented inquiry after it passes is the correct protocol.
Part 4 of 4 — What not to do during the activation window
Each of these mistakes is motivated by reasonable logic — stay active, use the good evaluation numbers, keep pace. The problem is not the motivation. It is the assumption that evaluation-phase behavior and parameters extend directly into the funded phase.
Most funded futures evaluation agreements prohibit holding a new evaluation from the same account holder while a funded account is in the provisioning or review process. The restriction exists because a concurrent evaluation creates the same multi-account exposure the agreement's account integrity rules are designed to prevent. Starting a new evaluation during the activation window may be flagged as a multi-account violation in the funded account's review — which is one of the four rejection triggers described in the article on why funded futures evaluation passes get rejected.
If you plan to evaluate with a different firm or at a different tier, wait until the funded account credentials have been issued and the account is active before starting. If the funded account is rejected during the provisioning review and you intend to re-evaluate at the same firm, contact the firm directly to confirm whether starting a new evaluation is permitted before the rejection is formally processed — starting without that confirmation may violate the agreement's terms for the rejected account as well.
If you trade in simulation during the activation window — to stay sharp, to review a setup, or to test the session structure for the funded account — keep position size at or below your funded account's planned sizing. Do not use the wait as an opportunity to practice at a higher size with the assumption that the funded account will continue from where the simulation left off. The funded account starts at Day 1 parameters: a new balance, a new trailing drawdown floor at the starting balance, and an independent consistency window. Simulation performance during the wait does not create any metric in the funded account.
The practical risk of oversizing in simulation during the wait is behavioral: a trader who runs through a 3-lot sim session the day before the funded account activates and sees a strong result has just set an expectation for funded performance that the funded account's parameters do not support. The funded account's per-trade ceiling from DLL/4 may be significantly below what the simulation allowed. The first funded session, sized to the funded parameters, will feel conservative by comparison — and that feeling is correct to follow, not overcome.
Evaluation performance is input to a funding decision, not to funded account sizing. The evaluation's average daily P&L, best-day percentage, and win rate describe how the evaluation performed — they do not set the funded account's per-trade ceiling or daily profit stop. The funded account's DTF/10 and DLL/4 formula uses the funded tier's parameters from the funded agreement. If the evaluation DLL was $1,500 and the funded DLL is $1,000, the funded per-trade ceiling is $250 — lower than what the evaluation allowed, even though the funded account has a higher balance.
Carrying evaluation sizing into the funded account is one of the most common reasons funded traders breach the DLL in the first week of a funded account — the evaluation's parameters may have allowed larger positions than the funded account's parameters support, and the funded account's DLL is enforced in real time without any grace period. The formula is the ceiling. A strong evaluation finish does not change the ceiling. Starting the first funded session at evaluation sizing rather than funded sizing is a mechanical rule violation that the funded account's DLL will catch, not a justified confidence in performance.
The typical funded futures account activation window is 1-3 business days from the pass notification. Some firms state a shorter window (24-48 hours); others state up to 5 business days. The specific timeline is usually in the firm's FAQ, evaluation agreement, or post-pass notification email. The clock starts from when the pass is confirmed and submitted for review, not necessarily from when the dashboard first displayed a pass status. During this window, the firm reviews the evaluation account and provisions the funded account — the trader's evaluation account is read-only until the review is complete and the funded account credentials are issued.
If the firm's stated activation window passes without communication, open a support ticket or send an email to the firm's support team with your account identifier and the date the pass notification was received. Ask for the current activation status, the expected completion date, and whether any documentation is required from you. One written inquiry is the appropriate action — avoid multiple follow-ups before receiving a response to the first. If the dashboard has changed state from pass to "under review," reference that specific change in your inquiry rather than asking a general status question.
Most funded futures evaluation agreements prohibit starting a new evaluation from the same account holder while the funded account is in the provisioning or review process. Starting a new evaluation during this window may be flagged as a multi-account violation in the funded account's review. Wait until the funded account credentials have been issued and the account is active before starting a new evaluation — whether at the same firm at a different tier or at a different firm entirely. If the funded account is rejected during the review, contact the firm directly to confirm what is permitted before starting a new evaluation.
Sim trading during the activation window is fine, but keep position size at or below your intended funded account sizing — the same ceiling calculated from the funded account's DLL divided by 4. Sim results during the wait do not transfer to the funded account. The funded account starts at Day 1 parameters regardless of simulation performance. The risk of oversizing in sim during the wait is behavioral: a larger-than-funded-parameters sim session sets an expectation the funded account's DLL ceiling does not support, and the first session at funded sizing will feel conservative by comparison — which is the correct response, not a signal to size up.
Evaluation performance is not the input to funded account sizing. The funded account's per-trade ceiling uses the funded tier's DLL divided by 4 — the funded DLL from the funded agreement, not the evaluation DLL and not the evaluation's P&L history. If the evaluation DLL was higher than the funded DLL, the funded account's per-trade ceiling is lower than what the evaluation allowed, even though the funded account has a higher balance. Carrying evaluation sizing into the funded account is one of the most common reasons funded traders breach the DLL in the first week of a new funded account.
Founding 100
The Founding 100 closes when 100 members are in. After that, pricing moves to the standard rate. If you're reading the library and working through evaluations, the founding tier is the time to join.
See the Founding 100 offer