Stage 2-3 bridge · Free
Most traders treat the pass notification as the finish line. It is the starting line for a different kind of preparation. The funded account has different rules, a new drawdown floor level, and account mechanics that may not match the evaluation. Knowing what to verify before day one prevents the most common first-session mistakes: sizing under the wrong drawdown distance, missing a rule change from evaluation to funded phase, or opening the first trade before the funded account dashboard is fully configured.
Part 1 of 4 — The review and activation window
The evaluation platform may show a "pass" status immediately when the profit target is reached. What that status means varies by firm — it may indicate a pending review or a confirmed pass. The funded account does not become available until the firm completes its side of the process.
When the evaluation platform marks a pass, the firm's internal review checks the same rules the dashboard displayed — but independently. This typically covers three areas. First, the firm confirms the profit target was genuinely reached: that the final balance after accounting for commissions and fees exceeded the target, not just the gross P&L display. Some evaluation dashboards show gross P&L; the firm's records are net. If there is a discrepancy, the firm's net figure governs. Second, the firm verifies no rule breach occurred during the evaluation period: no session where the trailing drawdown floor was breached, no DLL violation, no trading in prohibited instruments or outside allowed hours, and no violation of the minimum trading days rule by verifying that the correct number of qualifying sessions is confirmed. Third, for two-step evaluations, the firm confirms both phases were completed on the same account with no rule resets or account replacements between phases. This review typically completes in 1 to 3 business days. For firms that process a high volume of passes, it may take longer during peak periods. The activation email will confirm the funded account is ready — do not assume the review is complete based on the platform status alone.
During the review window, the evaluation account is typically placed in read-only mode. You can view the history and final metrics, but no new trades can be placed. This lock is automatic — you do not need to do anything to trigger it. If the platform appears to allow new trades on the evaluation account after the pass status appears, do not place them: any trades after the evaluation pass are not part of the evaluation contract and will not count toward the funded phase. Some traders attempt to "practice" on the evaluation account while waiting for the funded account. This practice is on a locked or closing account and does not reflect the funded account's rules, drawdown model, or starting conditions. Use the wait for actual preparation instead.
Four things to complete before the funded account activation email arrives. (1) Locate and read the firm's funded account agreement — this is a separate document from the evaluation terms and specifies the funded phase rules, payout conditions, and drawdown model. Many traders sign the funded agreement without reading it carefully because the evaluation rules are already familiar; the funded agreement may contain differences. (2) Confirm what the funded account's trailing drawdown distance will be, and whether it uses the same intraday or EOD trailing type as the evaluation. (3) Pre-calculate position sizing for the funded account tier using the funded drawdown distance and DLL values from the agreement — do not assume these match the evaluation's values exactly. (4) Read the payout section of the funded agreement to understand the minimum trading days, profit split, and consistency rule requirements that govern the funded phase. These are the rules the account will operate under from day one. Starting the funded account without reading the funded agreement is trading with rules you have not verified.
Part 2 of 4 — What changes in the platform
The most disorienting part of the transition is that the familiar evaluation dashboard disappears. A new funded account dashboard shows different starting numbers — different balance, different drawdown floor, different drawdown distance in some cases. Recognizing this before day one prevents confusion at the moment the funded account goes live.
When the firm provisions the funded account, it creates a new account in the trading platform with a distinct account number or ID. The evaluation account number is archived or deactivated. The funded account appears as a new login option, a new account selector in the platform, or a new credential set sent via email — depending on how your firm structures account provisioning. Before the first funded session, confirm which account number the funded account corresponds to in the platform and verify that the balance and drawdown floor displayed match the funded account starting values from the activation email. If the platform shows a balance or floor that does not match the activation email, contact firm support before placing any trades. Trading on the wrong account or under misread starting values is a common first-session error that is entirely preventable with a 5-minute dashboard verification before the session opens.
The funded account dashboard starts fresh — all metrics reset to the funded account's initial conditions. The balance shows the funded account starting balance, not the evaluation's ending balance. The trailing drawdown floor shows the funded account's starting floor level, which is the starting balance minus the funded account's trailing drawdown distance. The cumulative profit shows zero. The best-day percentage (for the consistency rule) shows zero or no data. The minimum trading days counter resets to zero if the funded phase has its own minimum days requirement. None of the evaluation's progress carries forward to the funded account. The only thing that carries forward is the trading behavior and decision process that produced the evaluation pass — and, depending on the behavioral pattern, the habits that contributed to any close calls during the evaluation. The evaluation dashboard guide covers how to read these metrics; the funded account dashboard uses the same display but with funded account starting values.
Not all funded accounts use the same drawdown model as the evaluation. The evaluation typically uses a trailing drawdown that advances with the account's high-water mark — intraday or EOD depending on the firm. The funded account may use the same trailing model, a trailing model with a lock mechanism, a static fixed drawdown from the starting balance, or a different EOD vs intraday trailing type than the evaluation. The funded account's trailing drawdown is a separate parameter from the evaluation's, and it is defined in the funded account agreement. The most detailed breakdown of how the funded phase drawdown model can differ from the evaluation is in how trailing drawdown rules change after you pass. Read it alongside the funded account agreement before day one. The agreement specifies the drawdown type; the article explains what each type means operationally for your pre-session routine.
Part 3 of 4 — Setting up for day one
Day one of the funded account is not the time to discover that the drawdown model is different from what you assumed during the evaluation. The setup steps below take less than 30 minutes and eliminate the most common first-session errors.
When the funded account goes live, the first thing to verify is the starting trailing drawdown floor level as displayed in the funded account dashboard — not as stated in the agreement. The dashboard is the authoritative source for the current floor level. The agreement states the drawdown distance; the dashboard calculates the starting floor as starting balance minus drawdown distance. Confirm that the floor displayed matches your calculation: funded starting balance minus funded trailing drawdown distance equals the starting floor. If those numbers do not agree, contact firm support before trading. A miscalculated or mis-displayed floor means every DLL and position sizing calculation for the session is based on the wrong cushion. This verification takes two minutes and prevents a first-session floor breach caused by assumptions rather than a rules breach.
The position sizing formula is the same as in the evaluation: trailing drawdown floor distance divided by 4 equals the maximum per-trade dollar risk; daily loss limit divided by 4 equals the maximum per-trade dollar risk from the DLL perspective; the lower of the two is the binding constraint. But the inputs may differ at the funded tier. The funded account's trailing drawdown distance may be different from the evaluation's — a $50,000 funded account may carry a $2,500 trailing drawdown distance where the evaluation used a $2,000 distance. The DLL in the funded account is a separate parameter from the evaluation's DLL. Recalculate per-trade sizing from scratch using the funded account's numbers, not the numbers you used throughout the evaluation. The formula is in the position sizing guide; the funded-tier comparison for different account sizes is in the account sizing by tier guide. Use both before day one to confirm the per-trade and per-session limits for the funded account's specific parameters.
Some rules stay identical between the evaluation and the funded account. The trailing drawdown floor breach ends the account — same as the evaluation. The DLL breach ends the session — same as the evaluation. Position sizing follows the same formula — same as the evaluation. Other rules change or take on different weight in the funded phase. The consistency rule in many funded accounts operates on a per-payout-period window rather than an all-time cumulative basis — the window resets after each approved payout. Some firms drop the consistency rule entirely in the funded phase. The minimum trading days requirement may apply only to the evaluation or may continue in each payout period. The drawdown model may have a lock threshold that does not exist in the evaluation. Read the funded account section of the firm's rules page specifically, not the evaluation rules page. The differences are what cause funded account failures in the first 30 days — not ignoring rules that are the same in both phases, but assuming funded phase rules match evaluation rules when they do not. The funded firm rule differences guide covers the three dimensions where firms most commonly diverge: drawdown timing, consistency scope, and payout mechanics.
The funded account activation is not permission to trade bigger. Before the trailing drawdown floor reaches its lock threshold, the funded account carries the same advancing-floor risk as the evaluation. Every session where the balance reaches a new high moves the floor closer to the current balance and reduces the available cushion for subsequent drawdowns. A first-session sizing increase on top of this advancing-floor risk is the pattern behind the majority of funded account failures in the first 30 days. Start the funded account at the same position size the evaluation ended at. Confirm the floor level before every session until the floor locks. The correct trigger for a sizing review is the floor lock event — not the pass confirmation. The sizing-up guide covers the four checks that must pass before adding a contract in the funded phase; all four of those checks require the floor to have locked first.
Part 4 of 4 — The first funded session
Evaluation accounts carry real costs — the fee, the time spent passing — but funded accounts carry an additional psychological weight: there is real payout potential, and the firm is now a counterparty watching the account. Knowing this shift exists before it happens makes it manageable.
In the evaluation, a failed pre-session checklist costs a breach and the evaluation fee — meaningful, but recoverable with another attempt. In the funded account, a failed checklist costs the same breach plus the behavioral proof that the process does not hold under a different account context. The funded account's stakes change the reliability of habitual behavior — patterns that held for 30 evaluation sessions may drift in the first funded session because the context is different. Running the pre-session checklist explicitly, rather than relying on the routine that worked in the evaluation, is the safest way to confirm the process transfers. This includes: confirming the floor level, recalculating the per-session DLL from the funded account's parameters, verifying no prohibited news event falls within the first session's planned window, and setting the profit stop for the session before the first trade. The full pre-session sequence is in the funded account trading plan guide.
The evaluation required reaching a profit target. The funded account has no required profit target per session — the goal is to stay in the account and accumulate qualifying sessions toward payout eligibility. This changes the correct definition of a successful first session: a session where the process was followed correctly is a successful session, regardless of the P&L result. A session that earns $400 through a sizing violation or an override of the checklist is a worse result than a session that earns $100 through a correctly executed process. The funded account's payout structure rewards consistency over multiple sessions — not a single large session. The evaluation's requirement to earn a specific target within a deadline created urgency that is no longer present in the funded phase. Removing that urgency is a behavioral adjustment that most traders need to make explicitly rather than assuming it happens automatically after the pass.
After the first funded session, run four checks before logging off. (1) Confirm the trailing drawdown floor moved as expected: if the session was profitable, the floor should have advanced (for trailing models); if the session closed at a loss, the floor should not have changed. If the floor did not behave as expected from the funded account documentation, review the drawdown model type and contact firm support if the displayed floor does not match the formula. (2) Update your per-session DLL and sizing calculation for the next session using the current floor level — the floor level at the start of the next session determines the position sizing, not the starting funded balance. (3) Check the best-day percentage display for the consistency rule if the funded account tracks it: note the first data point and whether the session's profit relative to the period's total is within the threshold. (4) Add the session to a trade log that tracks date, gross P&L, net P&L after commission, starting floor level, ending floor level, and position size used. This record is what the post-payout consistency review runs on — sessions without accurate records create ambiguity at the moment of payout request. The trade journal guide covers the five-field format that supports this review.
Most funded futures firms activate the funded account within 1 to 3 business days after the evaluation pass is confirmed. Some offer same-day or next-day activation; others may take longer during high-volume periods. If access details have not arrived within 3 business days, contact firm support with your evaluation account number and the date the pass status appeared. Do not assume the activation is automatic without an email confirmation from the firm.
Usually yes — the trading platform stays the same but the account number changes. The evaluation account is archived, and a new funded account number is provisioned in the same software. In some platforms the funded account appears as an additional account under the same login. In others the firm sends new credentials for a separate login tied to the funded account. Confirm which model your firm uses before day one so you load the correct account before the first trade.
The evaluation account is locked or archived when the pass is processed. No new trades can be placed on it. Some firms keep it in read-only mode for history review; others archive it entirely. The pass marks the end of the evaluation contract — the evaluation account is no longer a live trading account. Your evaluation trade history remains useful as a reference for calibrating the funded account start, particularly the per-session profit distribution and the consistency rule performance.
Use the activation window to prepare: (1) read the funded account agreement and note any rules that differ from the evaluation; (2) confirm the funded account's trailing drawdown model type (trailing with lock, static, or continuous trailing); (3) pre-calculate day-one position sizing using the funded account's DLL and drawdown distance; (4) review the payout requirements for the funded phase. The activation window is the last time these preparation steps can happen without session-day time pressure.
Not usually — funded account activation requires a firm-side review and provisioning step that takes at least several hours and typically 1 to 3 business days. The evaluation account locks immediately, creating a mandatory gap. Use this gap to confirm the funded account rules, verify the starting drawdown floor level, and recalculate position sizing for the funded tier before the first trade.
The funded account is not the evaluation with higher stakes. It is a different contract with different rules, a different drawdown model, and a different definition of what a good session looks like.
The evaluation proved you can follow the process for 30 sessions under a deadline. The funded account requires following the same process indefinitely, without a deadline, with real payout potential in the background. The method builds the operational layer that makes that transfer reliable — not just hopeful. First 100 founding seats at $19/mo — locked for life.