Stage 2 · Free
The funded account pre-session checklist pulls six values from the dashboard. Between sessions, five of those six can be maintained in a running format so the pre-session check becomes a verification rather than a calculation. The trailing drawdown floor is the exception — on EOD firms, it advances at settlement while no session is active, so the dashboard value at session start is always authoritative. This article covers what each of the six fields is, why the EOD floor cannot be carried from the prior entry, how to maintain the running best-day percentage including firm variation in denominator scope, and a five-session worked example showing all six fields updating together with the consistency hold trigger calculation.
Part 1 of 4 — The six between-session fields
Each field maps to a specific input in the funded account operating protocol: the DLL resets automatically, the floor feeds the sizing formula, cumulative period profit and best-day percentage feed payout eligibility, qualifying sessions feed Gate 3, and the consistency denominator determines whether a payout request will be held. Understanding what each field is and how it updates prevents the two most common between-session errors: carrying a stale floor and miscalculating the consistency hold trigger.
The daily loss limit (DLL) is not a running total to maintain — it resets to the full contractual amount at the start of each session. A session that ends with a $400 loss against a $1,000 DLL does not leave the next session with $600 remaining. The next session starts with a $1,000 DLL. The DLL is a per-session ceiling, not a period-accumulating balance. This distinction matters because the position sizing checklist recalculates the DLL ÷ 4 per-trade ceiling from the live dashboard at every session start. The dashboard shows the full DLL at session open — any reduction visible mid-session is the current session's drawdown from the starting DLL value. If the dashboard still shows a reduced DLL from the prior session at session start (which would indicate a platform display error or an intraday DLL model that does not reset), contact the firm before trading.
The key tracking awareness is negative: do not carry a "remaining DLL" figure from the prior session into today's pre-session calculation. The per-trade ceiling is DLL ÷ 4 from the full contractual DLL amount, not from whatever remained at the prior session close. Using a reduced prior-session DLL in today's sizing formula produces an artificially conservative ceiling — which is a safe error in terms of risk but not in terms of understanding your actual position capacity. See the full DLL mechanics in the evaluation dashboard article and the six-field pre-session sequence in the position sizing checklist.
The trailing drawdown floor is the one field in this list that cannot be maintained as a carry-forward between sessions. On EOD firms, the floor advances at settlement — a process that occurs after the session closes, outside any active trading period. If the session ended at a new account high-water mark, the EOD settlement advances the floor to that new high minus the drawdown distance (DTF). By the time the next morning's pre-session check runs, the dashboard shows the post-settlement floor, which is higher than the floor recorded in the journal at the prior session's end. Carrying the journal's value produces a floor-room overestimate equal to the amount the floor advanced at settlement. The consequences: the sizing formula calculates more available floor-room than actually exists, the drawdown recovery threshold appears farther away than it is, and the pre-session check produces a false sense of margin. See the full EOD timing mechanics in Part 2 of this article and the complete floor lifecycle in funded futures trailing drawdown floor mechanics.
On intraday firms, the floor updates in real time during the session — including during extended hours if the platform is active. The dashboard at session start reflects the floor at session open, which is the correct pre-session input. Whether the firm uses an EOD or intraday floor model, the authoritative source is always the live dashboard at session start. Recorded journal values are for reference only — the dashboard read is the verification that must happen before the first trade. The funded account tracking format records the floor from the dashboard at session start (not at session end), so the tracking entry and the pre-session check source are the same read. See the intraday model comparison in funded futures firm rule differences.
Cumulative period profit is the net running total of all session results from the start of the current payout period. It starts at zero on the first session of the period (after account activation or after the prior payout period closes) and updates after every session: add positive session results, subtract negative session results. Cumulative period profit is the Gate 1 input in the payout calculation — the gross profit before the firm's split percentage is applied. See the full five-gate payout calculation in funded futures payout calculation.
Best-day P&L is the largest single-session net profit in the current payout period. It updates only when the current session's result exceeds all prior sessions in the period. Best-day percentage is best_day_profit ÷ consistency_denominator, recalculated after every session because the denominator changes with every session result. When the ratio reaches the firm's consistency threshold (typically 25-30%), the consistency hold activates — a payout request submitted at that point would be held until the ratio drops below the threshold. Maintaining both figures between sessions converts the hold trigger from a surprise at payout request time into a scheduled clearing target. See the full consistency rule mechanics in funded account consistency rule.
Qualifying session count is the running count of sessions toward Gate 3 of the payout calculation — the minimum trading days requirement. Most firms count any session where at least one trade was executed as a qualifying session. Some firms require a net-positive session result or a minimum volume threshold (a minimum number of contracts traded). Verify the qualifying session definition in the funded agreement before assuming a simple session count. At firms that require net-positive results, a losing session adds to the session count but not to the qualifying session count — a distinction that delays Gate 3 clearance on losing-heavy periods. See the minimum trading days mechanics in the funded account trading plan context in funded futures minimum trading days.
Consistency window denominator is the total used as the denominator in the best-day percentage calculation. Two definitions exist across funded futures firms. The first is net period profit — the running total of all sessions positive and negative, the same as cumulative period profit. The second is positive-sessions-only profit — the cumulative sum of only the sessions that produced a positive net result. Under the net period profit model, a losing session reduces the denominator and increases the best-day percentage, which can reactivate or delay clearance of a hold. Under the positive-sessions-only model, a losing session has no effect on the denominator and the best-day percentage only moves on positive sessions. Firm agreements typically use the phrase "total profits" without specifying which model — if the definition is ambiguous, the safest assumption is net period profit because it applies the more conservative check. Part 3 of this article covers firm variation in denominator scope and the hold trigger calculation in detail.
Part 2 of 4 — The EOD floor timing problem
The EOD floor timing problem is the most common source of floor-room errors in funded account tracking. A trader who maintains an otherwise accurate journal can still enter a session with an incorrect floor estimate if the prior session ended at a new account high and the floor advanced at settlement. The practical rule: always pull the floor from the live dashboard at session start — the journal's recorded floor is a reference, not the pre-session input.
On EOD (end-of-day) firms, the trailing drawdown floor advancement calculation runs at settlement — the end of the regular trading session, typically 4:00 PM CT for US equity futures. The settlement calculation identifies the account balance at that time and advances the floor to: max(current_floor, settlement_balance − DTF). If the settlement balance is a new account high since the last floor advancement, the floor moves up to the new high minus the drawdown distance. If the settlement balance is below the prior high, the floor stays where it was. The post-settlement floor is the value the dashboard shows at the next session start. A session that ends with a balance of $51,200 on a $50K account with a $2,000 DTF and a prior floor of $48,400 produces a post-settlement floor of max($48,400, $51,200 − $2,000) = max($48,400, $49,200) = $49,200. The journal recorded $48,400 at the prior session's end. The next morning's dashboard shows $49,200. Carrying $48,400 as the session start floor overestimates floor-room by $800.
The overestimate compounds when multiple sessions produce account highs in sequence. A four-session run where each session ends at a new high — each advancing the floor at settlement — produces a growing gap between the journal's recorded floor (updated once per session during live trading) and the actual floor after four settlements. For a trader who records the floor at session close rather than at session start, the journal entries are systematically one settlement event behind the actual floor. The practical fix is to record the floor from the dashboard at session start, which captures the post-settlement value. The journal entry for "floor" in the funded account tracking format represents the floor as of that session's start — not the floor at that session's end, and not the floor from the prior session's journal entry. See the floor lock mechanics and the EOD vs intraday model comparison in funded futures trailing drawdown floor mechanics.
The EOD timing problem is more severe when a funded account holds a position through settlement. EOD firms calculate the settlement balance using the mark-to-market value of any open positions at the settlement price — including unrealized P&L. A position that shows +$800 unrealized at settlement advances the floor as if the account balance were $800 higher. If the position then moves against the trader overnight and is closed the next morning at −$1,200, two consequences follow: the floor is now $800 higher than before the overnight position (from the settlement advancement), and the realized loss at next-day close counts against a tighter floor that reflects the prior-session unrealized high. The net floor-room reduction is $800 (from floor advancement) plus $1,200 (from the realized loss) = $2,000, despite the trader only losing $400 net ($800 unrealized gain that became a $1,200 realized loss). The floor does not reverse when the unrealized gain disappears. See the full overnight position risk in funded futures overnight positions.
The tracking format implication: when any position is held through an EOD settlement, the next morning's floor value in the dashboard may reflect a settlement-time unrealized high that no longer corresponds to the current account balance. This is the scenario where the dashboard floor-room calculation and the manual floor-room calculation diverge most — the dashboard shows less floor-room than expected, because the floor advanced on an unrealized gain that has since reversed. The funded account tracking format handles this by always recording the dashboard floor at session start rather than calculating it from the prior balance, so the journal automatically reflects the post-settlement, post-reversal floor position rather than the pre-reversal estimated floor. The dashboard is the source, the journal is the record.
On intraday firms, the trailing drawdown floor updates in real time during the session based on the current account balance. There is no settlement calculation — the floor advances whenever the live balance reaches a new high. This means the floor can advance and retreat multiple times during a single session if the balance oscillates around its prior high-water mark (though the floor itself never retreats; it only advances). At session end, the floor reflects the highest balance point reached during that session. For a session that peaked at a new high mid-session and then pulled back by session close, the floor at session end is higher than the floor at session start — even if the session ended at a loss. This is the intraday whipsaw scenario covered in funded futures trailing drawdown floor mechanics.
For intraday firms, the floor recorded in the journal at session end is the floor at its highest point during that session — which is the correct floor for the next session's start only if the account did not reach a new high during extended hours before the next morning's pre-session check. In practice, intraday firms that update the floor in real time update it during any period the platform is active, including overnight if a position is held. The practical rule remains the same as for EOD firms: the dashboard value at session start is authoritative, regardless of the firm's floor model. Intraday firms add the additional consideration that the floor can continue to advance during the overnight period between sessions — a factor that EOD firms settle at a fixed time. The tracking format addresses both models the same way: the floor field is always the dashboard value at session start, recorded before the first trade.
Part 3 of 4 — Running best-day percentage and consistency denominator
Maintaining the running best-day percentage between sessions converts the consistency hold from a surprise at payout request time into a scheduled clearing target with a calculable timeline. The calculation is two updates after every session: update cumulative period profit by the session result, then update best-day P&L if today's session exceeds all prior sessions. Recalculate the ratio from both updated values.
After each funded account session, update the tracking format in this order: (1) add the session result (positive or negative) to cumulative period profit to get the updated denominator base; (2) update best-day P&L if today's session profit exceeds all prior sessions in the period — if not, leave the best-day value unchanged; (3) recalculate best-day percentage as best_day_profit ÷ consistency_denominator using the updated values from steps 1 and 2. The order matters because the denominator update from step 1 affects the ratio in step 3, and the best-day update from step 2 may change the numerator in step 3. Calculating the ratio before updating both components produces an intermediate value that does not correctly represent the end-of-session hold status.
The key insight for the updating sequence: a losing session that does not produce a new best day still changes the ratio in step 3. If cumulative period profit was $770 and the best day was $310 (40.3% ratio), a −$95 session reduces cumulative to $675 while leaving best day at $310. The updated ratio is $310 ÷ $675 = 45.9% — an increase of 5.6 percentage points from a losing session. At a firm with a 30% consistency threshold, the ratio is still well above the hold threshold in this example. But a period that is near the clearing threshold before a losing session can be pushed back above the threshold after it. Tracking the ratio between sessions makes this movement visible before the next payout request rather than at the moment the request is submitted. See the daily profit stop's role in limiting the best-day numerator in funded futures daily profit stop.
Two denominator definitions exist across funded futures firms. The first — net period profit — uses the sum of all session results including negative sessions. Under this model, the denominator moves with every session. A losing session reduces it and increases the best-day percentage. A profitable session increases it and decreases the percentage. This is the more common model and produces the scenario described in Part 3A: losing sessions move the hold trigger toward active. The second definition — positive-sessions-only profit — uses the sum of sessions that produced a positive net result. Under this model, losing sessions have no effect on the denominator. The ratio only changes on positive sessions: it increases when today's gain produces a new best day, and decreases when today's gain adds to the denominator without producing a new best day.
The practical difference: at a firm using positive-sessions-only denomination, a losing session is neutral for hold status. At a firm using net period profit denomination, a losing session that reduces cumulative can trigger or delay the hold clearance. The funded agreement is the authoritative source, but "total profits" is a common phrasing that is ambiguous between the two models. If the agreement does not specify, contact the firm's support channel for written clarification before relying on either assumption. Until the model is confirmed, track both values separately — cumulative net and cumulative positive-only — so the correct denominator can be applied as soon as the firm's model is confirmed. The firm variation in consistency rule mechanics is covered fully in funded futures firm rule differences.
The consistency hold clears when: consistency_denominator > best_day_profit ÷ threshold. For a best day of $310 and a 30% threshold: denominator > $310 ÷ 0.30 = $1,033. For a 25% threshold: denominator > $310 ÷ 0.25 = $1,240. The clearing target is a fixed number given the current best day — it does not change unless a new session produces a new best day and increases the numerator. Tracking the clearing target between sessions tells you exactly how much additional cumulative profit is needed before the hold drops. If the current denominator is $770 and the clearing target is $1,033, the hold needs $263 more of cumulative profit to clear. At an average session result of $154 over the prior five sessions, the hold should clear within two sessions.
The daily profit stop plays a key role in hold clearance: the profit stop ceiling (net profit × 0.28, or DLL ÷ 6 in recovery) prevents any single session from producing a new best day under normal conditions. If the daily profit stop is honored every session and the current best day is $310, no session in the period will exceed $310 unless the daily profit stop ceiling is also above $310. At a cumulative period profit of $770, the daily profit stop ceiling is $770 × 0.28 = $216 — well below $310. As long as the profit stop is applied, no session in this range can produce a new best day and move the clearing target higher. The practical conclusion: in a period where the profit stop ceiling is below the current best day, honoring the profit stop every session does two things simultaneously — it limits drawdown risk and it prevents the hold clearing target from increasing. These two goals are aligned, not in tension. See the daily profit stop calculation in funded futures daily profit stop and the full payout gate calculation in funded futures payout calculation.
Part 4 of 4 — Tracking format and five-session worked example
The tracking format bridges the evaluation journal (which focuses on per-trade fields and the failure diagnostic) and the pre-session checklist (which pulls values from the dashboard at session start). The journal article covers the evaluation phase. This format covers the funded account phase — where the diagnostic priority shifts from failure prevention to payout eligibility tracking and consistency hold management.
A funded account session tracking entry has seven fields: (1) date, recorded at session start; (2) session P&L, recorded at session end — the net result for the session in dollars; (3) cumulative period profit, updated at session end by adding the session result to the prior cumulative total; (4) best-day P&L, updated at session end only if today's result exceeds all prior sessions in the period; (5) best-day percentage, recalculated at session end from the updated best-day and denominator; (6) trailing drawdown floor, recorded at session start from the live dashboard — the only field recorded before the session rather than after; and (7) qualifying session count, incremented at session end if the session meets the firm's qualifying criteria. An optional eighth field is consistency hold status (YES/NO) derived from whether the best-day percentage is at or above the firm's threshold — useful as a quick payout eligibility indicator when reviewing the tracking format mid-period.
The structure differs from the evaluation journal in two ways: the funded account format omits per-trade fields (entry price, stop price, contract size) because the pre-session sizing checklist handles those verifications separately, and it adds a consistency hold status indicator because the funded account payout calculation depends on the ratio in a way the evaluation diagnostic does not. The evaluation journal is the right format during the evaluation phase; the funded account tracking format replaces it after the first funded account activation. Both formats are available throughout the funded account period as complementary tools — the evaluation journal for trade-by-trade diagnostic data, the funded account format for period-level payout eligibility tracking. See the evaluation journal's structure in funded futures evaluation journal.
Starting state: period start (first session after account activation or prior payout period close). Account balance: $50,000. DTF: $2,000. Floor: $48,000 (locked — floor stays at $50,000 − $2,000 until balance reaches $52,000, which is the floor-lock threshold). DLL: $1,000. Consistency threshold: 30% (net period profit denominator).
Session 1: Session P&L = +$220. Cumulative period profit: $220. Best-day P&L: $220 (new period high). Best-day percentage: $220 ÷ $220 = 100.0% → HOLD ACTIVE. Floor (dashboard): $48,000 (no advance; balance $50,220 < $52,000 lock threshold). Qualifying sessions: 1. Note: 100% on the first session of any period is expected — the denominator is equal to the numerator with one session. The ratio drops below 30% only when cumulative exceeds best_day ÷ 0.30 = $220 ÷ 0.30 = $733.
Session 2: Session P&L = +$155. Cumulative: $375. Best-day P&L: $220 (not updated; $155 < $220). Best-day percentage: $220 ÷ $375 = 58.7% → HOLD ACTIVE. Floor (dashboard): $48,000 (balance $50,375 < $52,000). Qualifying sessions: 2. Clearing target: cumulative needs to exceed $733 for the hold to clear. Remaining: $733 − $375 = $358 at current pace.
Session 3: Session P&L = −$95. Cumulative: $280 (net: $375 − $95). Best-day P&L: $220 (not updated; loss session). Best-day percentage: $220 ÷ $280 = 78.6% → HOLD ACTIVE. Percentage increased from 58.7% to 78.6% because the losing session reduced the denominator while the numerator stayed the same. Floor (dashboard): $48,000 (balance $50,280 < $52,000). Qualifying sessions: 3 (losing session still counts at most firms).
Session 4: Session P&L = +$310. Cumulative: $590. Best-day P&L: $310 (updated; $310 > $220 — new period high). Best-day percentage: $310 ÷ $590 = 52.5% → HOLD ACTIVE. New best-day session resets the clearing target: cumulative must now exceed $310 ÷ 0.30 = $1,033. Floor (dashboard): $48,000 (balance $50,590 < $52,000). Qualifying sessions: 4. New clearing target remaining: $1,033 − $590 = $443.
Session 5: Session P&L = +$180. Cumulative: $770. Best-day P&L: $310 (not updated; $180 < $310). Best-day percentage: $310 ÷ $770 = 40.3% → HOLD ACTIVE. Floor (dashboard): $48,000 (balance $50,770 < $52,000). Qualifying sessions: 5. Clearing target remaining: $1,033 − $770 = $263. Daily profit stop ceiling for session 6: $770 × 0.28 = $216 — below the current best day of $310, so the profit stop would prevent a new best day in session 6 under normal conditions. At the average session result from sessions 4-5 of +$245, the hold should clear within 2 sessions.
The five-session example reveals three patterns that are not visible from a single-session view. First, the losing session in session 3 increased the best-day percentage from 58.7% to 78.6% — the ratio moved backward on a day with no new best day, purely because the denominator shrank. This means a period that appears to be progressing toward hold clearance can reverse after a normal losing session. Tracking the ratio between sessions makes this visible before the next positive session — so a strong session 4 does not reset expectations that had already been updated by session 3.
Second, session 4 produced a new best day that reset the clearing target from $733 to $1,033. A new best day always increases the clearing target by more than it increases the denominator — the numerator grows by the full session result, while the denominator grows by the same amount, so the ratio remains above the threshold unless the cumulative already exceeded the old clearing target by a large margin. In this example, cumulative was $375 before session 4 — well below the old clearing target of $733. Session 4's $310 result pushed cumulative to $590 but raised the clearing target to $1,033, so the net effect was more remaining work to clear, not less. The daily profit stop prevents this outcome in most normal sessions by limiting any session's result to below the current best-day level. See the profit stop's role in funded futures daily profit stop.
Third, the floor stayed at $48,000 across all five sessions because the account balance never reached the $52,000 floor-lock threshold ($50,000 starting balance + $2,000 DTF). The floor-room at session 5 end is $50,770 − $48,000 = $2,770 — above the DLL of $1,000 and in normal operations territory. But the floor did not advance, which means the funded account is still in its pre-lock phase. See the floor lock condition and the post-lock behavioral adjustments in sizing up on a funded futures account and the full floor lifecycle in funded futures trailing drawdown floor mechanics. The payout request timing using the confirmed Gate 3 qualifying session count and the cleared hold condition is covered in how to read a funded futures payout confirmation.
Six metrics need to stay current between funded futures sessions: (1) the daily loss limit reset — it resets to the full contractual amount at session start, so yesterday's loss does not reduce today's DLL; (2) trailing drawdown floor — always pulled from the live dashboard, never carried from the prior entry, because EOD firms advance the floor at settlement; (3) cumulative period profit — the running net total from the current payout period start; (4) best-day P&L and best-day percentage — the largest single-session profit and its ratio to cumulative period profit; (5) qualifying session count — the running count toward Gate 3 minimum trading days; and (6) consistency window denominator — the total used as the denominator in the best-day percentage calculation, which varies by firm between net period profit and positive-sessions-only profit.
On EOD firms, the trailing drawdown floor advances at settlement, which occurs after the session closes. If the session ended at a new account high, the settlement calculation advances the floor to the new high minus the drawdown distance. The next morning's dashboard shows the post-settlement floor, which is higher than the floor recorded at the prior session's end. Carrying the journal value produces a floor-room overestimate equal to the settlement advancement. On intraday firms, the floor updates in real time and can continue to advance during extended hours if a position is held overnight. In both cases, the dashboard read at session start is the authoritative source. The funded account tracking format records the floor from the dashboard at session start — not at session end and not from the prior session's recorded value.
Update in this order after each session: first add the session result to cumulative period profit, then update best-day P&L if today's result exceeds all prior sessions in the period, then recalculate the ratio as best_day ÷ consistency_denominator. The ratio only moves lower when the denominator grows faster than the numerator — which happens on normal profitable sessions where no single session produces a new best day. A losing session that reduces cumulative period profit increases the ratio at firms using net P&L as the denominator, which can push a hold that was near clearing back above the threshold. Maintaining the running calculation between sessions makes this movement visible before the next payout request rather than at the time of submission.
The consistency hold activates when best_day_profit divided by the consistency denominator reaches or exceeds the firm's threshold, typically 25 to 30 percent. The hold does not stop ongoing trading — it means a payout request submitted while the hold is active would be held until the ratio drops below the threshold. The hold clears when cumulative period profit grows large enough relative to the best-day profit: the denominator must exceed best_day_profit divided by the threshold. For a best day of $310 and a 30 percent threshold, the denominator must exceed $1,033. Tracking the running ratio between sessions tells you exactly how much additional cumulative profit is needed before the hold clears, converting the hold from a surprise into a scheduled clearing target.
It depends on the firm. Most funded futures firms use net period profit as the denominator — all session results, positive and negative. Under this model, a losing session reduces the denominator and increases the best-day percentage, which can reactivate or delay clearance of a hold. Some firms use positive-sessions-only profit, which means losing sessions have no effect on the denominator and the ratio only moves on positive sessions. If the funded agreement states "total profits" without specifying the model, the safest assumption is net period profit, because that applies the more conservative consistency check. Until the model is confirmed, tracking both values separately allows the correct denominator to be applied as soon as the firm's model is clarified.
Founding 100
The Founding 100 closes when 100 members are in. After that, pricing moves to the standard rate. If you're reading the library and working through funded accounts, the founding tier is the time to join.
See the Founding 100 offer