After you're funded · Stage 3 · Free
The split percentage multiplies net period profit in the Gate 1 formula. Most traders know the number but not where it comes from. Two factors set the initial rate at account activation: account tier at purchase and the evaluation path taken (one-step vs two-step). Some firms then offer performance-based rate increases after repeat payouts from the same account, described in a separate addendum from the base funded agreement. And most funded agreements give the firm the right to modify the rate — with terms around notice and grandfathering that are material when building a long-term account relationship. This article covers all four dimensions: what the split applies to, what sets the initial rate, how it can improve, and when and how the firm can change it.
Part 1 of 4 — What the split rate applies to: net period profit, not gross balance gain
The distinction between net period profit and gross balance gain matters most in periods with a mix of profitable and losing sessions. Understanding what the split applies to prevents the common mistake of estimating the payout from the wrong base figure.
Net period profit is the cumulative P&L from trading activity logged within the current payout period. Every session's closed-trade P&L is added to or subtracted from the running total. A period that started at a funded account balance of $52,000, included sessions totaling $3,200 in gains and $1,400 in losses, and ended at $53,800 has a net period profit of $1,800 ($3,200 − $1,400). The gross balance gain — the increase from the $52,000 starting balance to $53,800 — is also $1,800 in this case. But these two figures diverge when fees, withdrawal-equivalent accounting adjustments, or prior-period balance carry-forward affects the starting balance reference point.
The split applies to the net period profit figure from the firm's dashboard, not from the trader's manual calculation. Dashboard figures are the firm's authoritative source for the Gate 1 calculation; if the dashboard cumulative period profit differs from the journal total (a common occurrence on EOD-settlement firms where the exact session profit calculation may differ from intraday estimates), the dashboard figure is what the firm uses. Run the split calculation from the dashboard's period profit figure, not from a manually tracked running total. See how to track the cumulative period profit field between sessions in how to track funded futures account metrics between sessions.
A period with $5,000 in gross session gains and $2,200 in session losses has a net period profit of $2,800. On a 90% split, the gross eligible amount (Gate 1) is $2,520 — not 90% of $5,000. Traders who run a mental estimate from gross gains and then receive a lower-than-expected payout amount have typically made this error: they estimated from $5,000 × 0.90 = $4,500 when the correct Gate 1 calculation produces $2,520. The losing sessions within the period are part of the cost structure for the period, and they reduce the split base directly. This is distinct from the trailing drawdown floor (which tracks the worst-case account protection level) and from the daily loss limit (which is a per-session hard cap). The net period profit is a pure accounting figure: session gains minus session losses since the last payout reset.
The second implication is that the order of sessions within a period does not affect the net period profit — only the total net matters for the split calculation. A period that starts with three losing sessions and ends with four profitable ones produces the same net period profit as a period with the same sessions in reverse order, as long as the totals match. What the order does affect is the consistency rule best-day percentage, because the denominator (cumulative period profit) grows at different rates depending on when within the period the losses and gains occur. The split and the consistency rule operate on the same base (cumulative period profit) but in opposite directions: the split benefits from a higher base, while the consistency rule risk increases when one session's gain is large relative to the base at the time of that session. See the full five-gate sequence in how to calculate your funded futures payout before you request it.
Gate 1 produces the gross eligible amount: net_period_profit × split_percentage. This is the maximum the trader is eligible to receive based on trading performance alone. Gate 4 (buffer ceiling) then applies a constraint based on the account's balance relative to the trailing drawdown floor: maximum safe withdrawal equals the buffer above the floor minus the required post-withdrawal cushion. The final payout is the lower of the Gate 1 gross eligible amount and the Gate 4 buffer ceiling. In most funded account periods, the Gate 4 buffer ceiling is the binding constraint — especially early in the funded account lifecycle when the floor has not yet locked and the balance-floor gap is narrower. In these periods, increasing the split rate would not increase the payout because the buffer ceiling is already below the gross eligible amount.
The split rate becomes the binding constraint only when the buffer ceiling is large relative to the net period profit — typically in periods where the account is well above the floor (locked floor with significant accumulated profit), the period profit is modest, and the required cushion is satisfied. In these cases, a higher split rate directly translates to a higher payout: for every additional percentage point of split, the payout increases by net_period_profit × 0.01. At a $2,000 net period profit, a 5% split increase (80% to 85%) adds $100 to the payout when the buffer is not the binding constraint. The same $100 gain is invisible when the buffer ceiling limits the payout to $1,600 regardless of the split rate. See the buffer ceiling calculation and the binding constraint check in how to calculate your funded futures payout before you request it.
Part 2 of 4 — What determines the initial split rate at account activation
Verifying the stated split rate in the funded agreement before the first session takes less than five minutes and prevents the common surprise of discovering the rate differs from what the product page described at the time of evaluation purchase.
Some funded futures firms scale the split rate with the account tier at purchase. A common structure is a lower rate at the smallest tier ($25K or $50K) and a higher rate at the largest tier ($100K or $150K), with one or two intermediate values. The rationale is that larger accounts represent a higher funding commitment from the firm and are typically taken by traders with more capital to commit to the evaluation — the higher split rewards the larger capital deployment. A representative structure: 80% at $25K, 85% at $50K, 90% at $100K, and 90% at $150K (with the $100K and $150K tiers sharing the ceiling rate).
Not all firms use tier-based splits. Some firms offer the same split rate across all tiers, using other factors (such as the evaluation path or a performance program) to differentiate the offer. When comparing firms, verify whether the split rate shown on the product page is tier-specific or flat across all tiers — this distinction is often in fine print below the headline rate. The tier-based split is set at account activation based on the evaluation tier purchased, and does not change if the account's balance grows above the tier boundary after funding. A $50K funded account that grows to $60,000 through trading stays at the $50K-tier split rate unless the firm has an explicit policy for reclassifying funded accounts at higher balances. See how account tier affects per-trade sizing ceilings and instrument fit in funded futures account sizing by tier.
Some firms differentiate the initial split rate by the evaluation path the trader used to earn funding. A one-step evaluation has a single phase in which all three gates (profit target, drawdown limits, minimum trading days) must be cleared in one continuous run. A two-step evaluation has two phases; Phase 1 establishes the profit target, and Phase 2 requires the trader to demonstrate consistency at a lower profit target with the same drawdown rules in place. One-step passes carry more statistical weight as evidence of process consistency: the trader had fewer total sessions to satisfy the gates and was exposed to the full drawdown rules for the entire evaluation period without a Phase 1 buffer. Some firms set the initial split 5–10 percentage points higher for one-step passes to compensate for the harder path.
The evaluation path split differential is disclosed at the time of evaluation purchase, not at the time of account activation. The product pages for one-step and two-step evaluations at the same firm will show different funded split rates if the firm applies a path differential. If switching firms after evaluating with a two-step structure, check whether the new firm's one-step evaluation carries a meaningfully higher initial split — the combined cost of a one-step evaluation (typically higher evaluation fee and fewer allowed reset days) against the split differential may be worth calculating before choosing a path. See the one-step vs two-step cost comparison in funded futures one-step vs two-step evaluation: which to choose.
The funded account agreement is issued after the evaluation pass is confirmed and the funded account is activated. It contains the split rate that applies to the first payout period and typically to all subsequent periods unless a performance program or a firm-initiated rate change modifies it. The product page and the evaluation terms describe the expected split, but the funded agreement is the document that governs the funded account relationship. Mismatches between the product page and the funded agreement are uncommon, but community reports across multiple firms document cases where the rate in the agreement differed from what the product page stated at the time of evaluation purchase — sometimes because the firm updated its terms between the evaluation purchase date and the account activation date.
Three things to check in the funded agreement before the first session: (1) the specific split percentage stated for the initial payout period, (2) whether the rate is described as fixed for the life of the account or subject to the firm's general modification clause, and (3) whether any performance program terms are included in the base agreement or referenced as a separate addendum that must be reviewed separately. If the funded agreement's split rate differs from the product page rate by more than a rounding difference, contact the firm's support to confirm which rate governs before the first session — not after the first payout request. The rate stated in the funded agreement controls the calculation that the firm runs when reviewing the payout request.
Part 3 of 4 — Performance-based split increases: how programs work and where to find the terms
A performance bump is not a guarantee — it is a conditional increase tied to a specific milestone. Reading the addendum before the first payout reveals whether you are on a path toward a higher split and what is required to reach it.
The most common performance program structure ties split increases to the number of completed payouts from the same funded account. A representative structure: initial split 80%, increases to 85% after the 2nd completed payout from the account, and to 90% after the 4th completed payout. The account must remain the same funded account — not a reset, repurchase, or new funded evaluation — for the payout count to accumulate toward the next milestone. A reset after a breach returns the count to zero if the payout count is tied to the specific account instance rather than to the trader's profile.
The timing of the bump matters: the payout that triggers the milestone is typically paid at the prior rate, and the increased rate takes effect on the next period that opens after the milestone is reached. The 2nd payout that triggers an 80% → 85% bump pays at 80%; the 3rd payout (first payout of the new period opened after the milestone) pays at 85%. This means the trader who submits the milestone payout on day one of the period and holds the account open for additional sessions still starts the next period at the higher rate — the bump is triggered by the payout count milestone, not by the timing of the submission within the period. Verify the triggering condition in the addendum: some programs define the milestone as "N approved payouts" rather than "N submitted requests," meaning a rejected request does not count.
Some firms structure performance programs around the total cumulative amount received from the account rather than the number of payouts. Example: initial split 80%, increases to 90% when the total cumulative amount received from this funded account exceeds $10,000. The cumulative total tracks the sum of all payout amounts received from the specific account — partial payouts, full buffer-ceiling payouts, and all periods combined. The milestone is typically measured against amounts received (funds transferred to the trader), not amounts requested or approved. A payout request that is approved but not yet transferred does not count toward the milestone until the transfer is received.
Cumulative milestone programs favor traders who take frequent, smaller payouts from a long-running account over those who accumulate a large buffer and take one large payout. A trader who takes six $2,000 payouts ($12,000 cumulative) hits the $10,000 milestone by the fifth payout, earning the higher split from payout six onward. A trader who accumulates for six periods and takes one $12,000 payout does not reach the milestone until that single payout is received — on the same timeline in terms of account age, but with a different hit count and different split for the subsequent periods. The cumulative structure benefits the high-frequency payout strategy more directly than the payout-count structure, which benefits consistent repeatability regardless of payout size.
A smaller set of firms offers split increases based on within-period trading performance metrics rather than payout count or cumulative totals. Common criteria: a profit-to-DLL ratio above a threshold for the period (e.g., the period's net profit must be at least 2× the DLL amount to qualify for the bump), a minimum number of qualifying sessions above a size floor, or a maximum drawdown-from-period-high below a target. These programs more closely mirror the firm's actual assessment of trading quality, but they also add a calculation layer to the pre-payout verification: the trader must confirm both that the standard five gates pass and that the performance criteria is met.
Period performance programs are the least common of the three program types and are most often described in an addendum rather than the base funded agreement or the product page. If the firm's product page mentions a "performance tier" or "trader advancement program" without detail, the specific criteria are in the addendum. Request the addendum from support before the first session — not after a payout request returns at the lower rate because the performance criteria was not met. Performance program splits typically are not retroactive: if the criteria is met in period 3 but the request is submitted without claiming the performance rate, the firm processes at the base rate and does not adjust after the fact. The trader must claim or confirm the performance criteria is met as part of the payout request process at firms that offer this structure. See how firms differ in their payout mechanics, consistency rule scope, and rule structures in how funded futures firm rules actually differ.
Part 4 of 4 — Whether the split rate can change: modification rights, notice, and grandfathering
The rate-change clause is the most consequential section of the funded agreement for long-term split rate planning — and the section most traders skip entirely when reviewing the document at activation.
Funded account agreements routinely include a clause giving the firm the right to modify terms — including the split rate — with advance written notice. The notice period specified in the agreement is the key number: 7 days, 14 days, or 30 days are common. A firm with a 7-day notice clause can announce a split rate reduction on Monday and apply it to all accounts the following Monday. A firm with a 30-day notice clause gives traders a longer window to plan, request any pending payouts before the change takes effect, or assess whether continuing the account under the new terms makes sense. The clause does not mean the firm will reduce the rate — it means the firm has reserved the right to do so without requiring renegotiation.
The three things to note when reading the rate-modification clause: (1) the required notice period before the change takes effect; (2) whether the clause applies to the split rate specifically or to the funded agreement terms generally (a general modification clause covers the split rate by implication, but a specific split-rate clause makes the firm's intention explicit); and (3) whether the clause distinguishes between rate increases and rate decreases — some agreements allow the firm to increase the split unilaterally but require a longer notice period or trader consent for a decrease. Rate decreases are the scenario that matters for planning; rate increases are universally accepted without dispute.
Grandfathering provisions protect existing funded accounts from rate changes that apply to new accounts or to future evaluation products. A firm with a grandfathering clause locks the split rate for each funded account at the rate stated in that account's original funded agreement, for the life of the account (or for a defined grandfathering period). A rate change announced after account activation applies only to evaluations purchased after the announcement date — existing funded accounts continue at their original rate regardless of how many more periods they run. A firm without grandfathering provisions applies the new rate to all accounts at the next period reset after the change takes effect.
The distinction is material for traders who plan to continue with a funded account through many payout periods. Under grandfathering, the split rate at activation is the rate for the account's lifetime (barring performance bumps). Without grandfathering, the split rate is the firm's current rate, updated to whatever the firm's terms state at the next period reset. Community discussions of split rate changes at funded futures firms consistently show that grandfathering language, or the absence of it, is the most significant factor in trader reaction: accounts that are grandfathered treat the announcement as informational; accounts that are not grandfathered face a decision about whether to continue or to explore switching. See what changes when switching funded futures firms and how to sequence an account transition in how to switch funded futures firms.
Payouts that have been approved and transferred are not affected by subsequent split rate changes regardless of grandfathering language. The payout amount was calculated and processed at the rate in effect during that period; the transfer closes the calculation. Rate changes affect future periods — periods that have not yet opened or have opened but not yet closed with a completed payout. A rate reduction announced during an active period typically takes effect at the start of the next period, not mid-period. The current period's payout, when submitted and approved, is calculated at the rate that was in effect when the period opened — unless the funded agreement's rate-change clause explicitly states that announced changes apply mid-period, which is unusual.
The practical implication: if a firm announces a rate reduction during a period in which the trader has already met all five gates, submitting the payout request immediately (before the change takes effect) locks the current period's payout at the prior rate. The next period that opens after the change date pays at the new rate. This is one scenario where timing the submission within a window — before a rate change rather than for processing speed — is materially worth the session-holding risk of delaying until the announcement clears. In all other timing decisions, submission timing is driven by the five-gate arithmetic and the consistency clearance margin, not by processing speed or calendar preferences. See the full payout timing decision framework in funded futures payout request timing — when to request vs when to wait.
The payout split percentage applies to net period profit — cumulative net trading profit for the current payout period after all session losses are subtracted from gains. It does not apply to gross session gains or to the account's overall balance gain from the funded account starting balance. The Gate 1 formula: gross eligible amount equals net period profit multiplied by the split percentage. This gross eligible amount is then compared to the Gate 4 buffer ceiling, and the final payout is the lower of the two. Run the split calculation from the dashboard's cumulative period profit figure, not from a manually estimated running total, because the dashboard figure is what the firm uses in its review.
Two factors most commonly determine the initial split rate at account activation: the account tier at purchase (some firms offer a higher rate at larger account sizes, for example 80% at $25K and 90% at $100K) and the evaluation path taken (some firms offer a higher initial rate for one-step evaluation passes than two-step passes). The funded account agreement issued at activation is the binding source for the actual rate — verify the stated split rate in that document before the first funded session, not from the product page. The funded agreement controls the rate the firm uses in its payout review; a product page discrepancy must be resolved with the firm before submitting the first payout request.
Some firms offer performance-based split increases; many do not. Common program structures: payout-count milestones (split increases from 80% to 85% after the 2nd payout from the same account, to 90% after the 4th), cumulative payout milestones (split increases when total cumulative received from the account crosses a dollar threshold), and period performance criteria (split increases for periods where profit-to-DLL ratio or session count meets a target). Performance programs are typically in a separate addendum from the base funded agreement. The bump usually takes effect on the period after the milestone is reached, not the period in which the milestone is hit. Read the addendum before the first session — not after a payout returns at the lower rate because the milestone was not tracked.
Most funded agreements give the firm the right to modify the split rate with advance notice — commonly 7 to 30 days. Whether the change applies to existing funded accounts or only to new accounts opened after the change date depends on the grandfathering language in the agreement. A grandfathering clause locks existing accounts at the rate stated in their original funded agreement. Without grandfathering, the new rate applies to all accounts at the next period reset. When reviewing a new firm's funded agreement, read the modification clause for: the required notice period, whether the clause applies to the split rate specifically, and whether existing accounts are grandfathered. These terms are the most consequential for long-term funded account planning.
The headline split rate matters, but rate-change terms and grandfathering matter more when comparing firms at similar rates. A 90% split with a grandfathering clause that locks the rate for active accounts is more predictable than a 90% split with a broad modification clause and no grandfathering. For traders planning to accumulate many payouts from a single account over time, the performance program structure — whether repeat payouts trigger a split increase and how quickly — is a material factor in the total revenue from the account. For traders focused on one or two early payouts before evaluating next steps, the initial rate and the minimum threshold (Gate 2) have more direct impact on the first payout than the long-run program structure. Verify the firm's payout history alongside the split terms: a higher rate that is frequently delayed or disputed in the community is worth less than a lower rate that pays predictably. See how to assess a firm's payout reliability before committing in how to verify a funded futures firm pays out before you commit.
Founding 100
The Founding 100 closes when 100 members are in. After that, pricing moves to the standard rate. If you're reading the library and working through funded accounts, the founding tier is the time to join.
See the Founding 100 offer